‘Shed the Lead’ and the Injuries in the Cath Lab

“I’d probably be a quadriplegic,” said Interventional Cardiologist Dean J. Kereiakes, MD, when asked what would have happened if two top neurosurgeons at his hospital hadn’t rushed him to the operating room (OR) for a cervical decompression in February this year.
Kereiakes had orthopedic problems for years due to the heavy lead aprons he wore in the cath lab. He regularly dosed himself with steroids for disc pain so he could stand up straight and continue to do procedures. “Several times a year I’d go on a tapering dose of prednisone of about 10 days to 2 weeks, and this would take care of it.”
But then his luck ran out. “I’m told in retrospect that my gait — the way I walked — was different, and I was also having some myoclonic jerking in my legs when I was going to sleep. I thought it was peculiar, but I didn’t really tie it together that this was an upper tract injury response.”
At a restaurant with his wife, he found himself unable to sign the check. “I couldn’t write my name.” By the next morning, “I had a floppy right foot, and as I turned around to put my scrubs on, everything fell apart. My arms began to not function and my legs — I couldn’t walk.”
Admitted to The Christ Hospital Heart & Vascular Center in Cincinnati — the very hospital he works in — Kereiakes had CT and MRI scans and consulted with neurosurgeons he counts as friends. He was given extremely high doses of intravenous steroids. “But instead of getting better, the pain came back, and I started posturing — when you posture, it looks like a praying mantis, your arms are flexed up, your wrists are flexed, and your fingers are spasmed together.” His wife and the nurses couldn’t pull his fingers open, “so they rolled me back, and the posturing started to go away.”
This prompted the neurosurgeons to bring him to the OR “by 6 AM, and they are ‘unzipping me in the back’ to basically get my spinal cord off my spine. I had cord compression at C2-3 and C 6-7.”
Post-op, Kereiakes couldn’t move his right leg and couldn’t close any of his fingers. “You lose control of things like bladder and bowel function — you have a catheter in — and you say to yourself, ‘How am I going to live like this?.'”
The quick-thinking of his neurosurgeons prevented permanent paralysis, and after a long 6-month recovery, Kereiakes is back in the cath lab, performing procedures. But crucially, he will no longer have to wear a lead apron.
Ending Careers Early. A Catalyst for Change
Typically, interventional cardiologists, interventional radiologists, electrophysiologists, and others working in labs where they are exposed to ionizing radiation wear lead aprons and garments, such as thyroid collars, leaded caps, and glasses, to protect them during procedures.
Long-term occupational exposure to radiation is linked to cataracts; brain tumors; cancers, including leukemia, multiple myelomas, lymphomas, and thyroid cancers; and left-sided breast cancers in women because the aprons don’t always cover the left side of the chest adequately.
Individual states set the standards in terms of the thickness of the lead required, varying from 0.25- to 0.5-mm–lead-equivalent aprons, which reduce exposure by 85%-95%. Radiation safety officers monitor the badges that staff wear to record their radiation exposure and will warn them when their levels are too high.
But — as Kereiakes freely admits — ambitious interventionalists don’t always take much notice. “They would come and say, ‘Hey your badge is really high,’ and so I would just put it in a drawer and carry on,” he said. “When you are younger, you feel immortal.”
Current President of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI), James B. Hermiller, Jr, MD, agrees: “The feeling is that, with lead, you are indestructible, and no one wants to show any weakness.”
Another occupational hazard related to those protective lead aprons was also being ignored, that of orthopedic injury. In surveys done by SCAI, around half of interventional cardiology respondents report cervical, lumbar, hip, knee, or ankle joint injuries.
While Kereiakes recognizes likely bias — with those afflicted more likely to complete these surveys — he believes that the problem is huge and “is ending careers early.”
“It’s interesting that radiation is at the forefront of protection and occupational safety, but you are much more likely to be taken out of work because of orthopedic injury,” explained Hermiller, who is also director of Structural Heart Program at Ascension St. Vincent Heart Center in Indianapolis.
His own story “is not as compelling as Dean’s, but 17 years ago, I ruptured a disk in my lower spine and had emergent surgery and I now need a neck surgery.”
Kereiakes’ case was “a catalyst” for his hospital to investigate, and eventually commit to, the purchase of a new radiation protection system which allows the labs using radiation to effectively go “lead-free.”
Hermiller’s hospital, too, has purchased multiple radiation protection systems. “If you want to do this job for 30 years, you have to protect yourself early and at all times,” he said.
His focus as SCAI president is to help get these protection systems in place at more hospitals.
But significant challenges remain, not least the cost, which can be $150,000-$200,000 per lab. He estimates that fewer than 10% US hospitals with cath and other labs using radiation have installed such systems.
Most systems are not US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved because they are not attached to equipment in the cath lab, something that Nadia Sutton, MD, MPH, chair of the SCAI Women in Innovations committee, said many physicians are not aware of. “The companies [marketing the systems] are telling us that we can ‘shed our lead,'” she said. “It could be safe, but we are using the data provided by the companies.”
How Do the Lead-Free Systems Work?
Currently, there are three main radiation protection systems available. The Protego Radiation Protection System (Image Diagnostics), the EggNest Protect (Egg Medical), and the Rampart (Rampart ic).
According to Kereiakes, they differ somewhat in whether they allow immediate access to the patient or whether you can see and interact with them. He explained that in high-risk procedures, easy access is desirable. “If you get a perforation or tamponade and the patient suddenly goes ‘out,’ you need to be able to get to them quickly, and you can’t be spending a lot of time taking the shielding down.”
Kereiakes was recovering in the hospital when his colleagues plumped for the EggNest system. He thinks they chose it because it offers visibility and access to the patient and “takes 4-5 minutes, maximum, to set up.” So far, he agrees with the choice but wants to “give it a real, volume-driven try.”
If they are satisfied with the system, the hospital will order six more by the end of the year, he said. A significant financial undertaking, he acknowledged.
Hermiller cited data for the Rampart system showing a 95% reduction in radiation without any lead. For an average 1-GRAY radiation exposure case, “if you wear lead, you reach the maximum dose of radiation around 850 cases in a year. If you do it with one of these protection systems, in this case Rampart, you can do 14,500 cases in a year. Not that anyone would do that [many].”
The Protego system has very similar data, he noted. The systems protect the operator and whoever is scrubbing in at the table, so those on the other side of the protector still need to wear lead, Hermiller stressed.
Data for the EggNest Protect are available but are as yet unpublished.
Hermiller acknowledged that there is still a long way to go in getting hospitals to spend the money on these systems, but he thinks cath lab operators will drive the change.
“At our SCAI meeting this year, the biggest attendance was at a session about a lead-free cath lab environment.”
Regulation at the State Level
Despite the excitement among the profession, Sutton — who is director of Interventional Cardiology Research in the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee — still has concerns about the lack of FDA regulation.
There is one newer system, called the Radiaction shield system, that attaches to the existing equipment so that is regulated by the FDA as a class II device, she noted. “But it is my understanding that the Protego, Rampart, and EggNest are Class I Exempt. That is the same category as Band-Aid.”
James Beabout, chief marketing officer, Egg Medical, confirmed that the EggNest “is classified as a Class I device which does not require FDA approval. That leaves regulation to each state regarding the requirements for protective aprons.” And Mark Hansen, vice president business development, of Image Diagnostics — the manufacturer of the Protego Radiation Protection System — confirmed that “the real governance is at the state level.”
The company petitions the state regulator for an exemption letter to the wearing of lead aprons. “In some cases, the state will come to the site directly and validate the systems integrity and to confirm their decision. Once the exemption is granted, the state sends a document, and it’s the responsibility of the sites’ Radiation Safety Officer (RSO) to change the labs safety process and rules,” Hansen explained.
“What really makes this work is a real-time dosimetry from Fluke Medical. Staff wear one to two badges that instantly detects exposure,” Hansen stressed.
Similarly, said Beabout, Egg Medical has data from over 1000 real-world cases collected using real-time dosimetry (RaySafe i3 system) which demonstrate that it is possible to get some people in the room out of protective aprons, where allowed. They recommend real-time dosimetry anytime people are removing their aprons, “since the patient BMI, x-ray system type/age, and complexity of the case all have a significant effect on the radiation dose in each case.” Their goal is for exposure to be zero or as close to zero as possible, “otherwise we recommend use of protective aprons. With the EggNest, operators can use much lighter aprons (0.125 mm sold by Burlington Medical) than what has traditionally been used, so that is also an option,” he said.
Hermiller said the SCAI plan is to produce several statements on going lead-free, with all other interested professional societies — such as those representing interventional radiologists and vascular surgeons, as well as all the major cardiology societies.
“We want to make an intellectual foundation for this,” Hermiller explained. Guidelines “are in the making,” he said, with the expectation that they will be ready by the end of this year or early next year.
SCAI will also work with the 50 US states to facilitate lead-free labs, “as each one has a different way to be approved to go without lead,” he noted.
“This is not going to go away, it’s going to build in force, through the societies,” said Kereiakes. “It’s a matter of workplace safety.” He doesn’t think that the federal Occupational Health and Safety Administration does much to protect doctors, nurses, and technicians in the cath and other labs.
Hermiller agreed: “I always say that if we were a GM car plant, they would shut us down.”
Hermiller also stressed the expense of having doctors and other staff off work with occupation-related injuries. He has already observed that “it’s much easier to recruit cath lab staff to a place where they don’t have to wear lead.”
He anticipates that the next generation of physicians “are going to demand places where they don’t have to wear lead.” He is also hopeful that it will result in more women choosing interventional cardiology: “Women are safe in the cath lab with current lead systems, but if we could move to this, there would be even more women participating.”
Pregnancy Safe in the Cath Lab
Sutton reiterated his point: “The number-one message that I want to get across is that it is considered safe for the unborn baby, being in the cath lab, under lead,” she said, noting that there are very good data that the amount of lead that is required by states results in negligible radiation exposure to the developing fetus.
She had her children before working in the cath lab, “but I’ve heard from other women: It’s heavy and its sweaty for prolonged periods of time, but it can be done and you can get through it,” she said. Although the promise of radiation protection systems “is exciting, we have to approach this with some level of caution or awareness,” she said. “Cardiologists come from a cardiology background. We are not radiologists who go through a radiology residency, like IRs do. They get a lot of training on radiation exposure and what it means,” Sutton stressed.
Kereiakes, for his part, remains enthusiastic. He returned to the cath lab in August, just 6 months after his brush with near quadriplegia. “This is what I’ve spent my life doing and I love doing it, and I’m not ready to quit.”
Hermiller, Kereiakes, and Sutton reported having no relevant financial conflicts of interest.
 
Send comments and news tips to [email protected].